Are people dying of climate change
Evolution: The end of mankind due to climate change
Of humans and mice
On the one hand, populations of animals with short reproductive cycles fluctuate more and thus increase the chance of fluctuating to zero due to sheer bad luck. On the other hand, slow organisms need much more time to recover from crises and are therefore more susceptible to nasty double blows. Another possible factor is the basal metabolic rate. If this is unusually high, which is the case with us, the risk of extinction increases - at least with mollusks. Extreme body size in one direction and the other currently seems to be a disadvantage in mammals that increases the risk of extinction, which also speaks against us.
It is completely open whether technology and culture tend to help us survive or, on the contrary, make us more vulnerable. On the one hand, technical aids have made mankind more independent of fluctuating environmental conditions for thousands of years and will continue to do so in the future - on the other hand, we are culturally and socially more dependent on them. This means: If the technical infrastructure fails in the long term, it will be difficult to land gently at a lower level because the know-how is often lacking.
In addition, many high-density societies can suddenly no longer meet basic needs such as water and food without this infrastructure; this would probably lead to chaos and reduce the ability to intercept the original crisis through organized technical or cultural measures.
Personally, I don't think technology and culture make that much difference. The respective time horizons are too different: Human societies find it difficult to keep track of 100 years - a possible extinction, on the other hand, would be a process over five to ten generations or more that would have to be averted on the same time scale. And then there is still the risk that the attempt to combat climate change in a targeted manner will go badly in the pants due to unintended effects.
But something like that is ultimately pure speculation, in one direction or the other. From a scientific perspective, in my opinion, there is currently no evidence that the future climate will acutely threaten the very existence of mankind. Rapid, significant climate change increases the risk of all species, but what we know so far about extinction makes us appear to be a less endangered species.
Whether less endangered species are actually safe depends, of course, on how drastic the crisis really becomes. In addition, there are indeed a number of possible warning signals that could indicate the corresponding risks. Apart from that, it doesn't have to be climate change alone. It is enough if it reinforces other developments. For example, conflicts that lead to a global nuclear war. But, as I said, that is speculation.
- Can international students work in China?
- What are some typical Canadian foods
- What role does NABH play
- Why is everyone different from everyone else
- Are clairvoyants real 1
- Which industries need ERP
- Is Hokkien a language or a dialect
- Why does someone become addicted to money
- Pays Medicare for assisted living
- What advice do you always ignore
- What is the national dish of Portugal
- Is knn unsupervised learning
- How good is membership in Club Mahindra
- When is the line project 2020
- When do big things happen
- What habits do successful people avoid
- How do I attract Arab women
- How population growth causes traffic jams
- What do Mexicans usually eat for dinner?
- Are there openings for freshmen in civil engineering
- Can a Muslim girl marry a Buddhist?
- Who is your employer for non-profit organizations
- Is the application of deodorant spray harmful?
- Did you like the 90s